This is the only picture I have at the moment.
Any thoughts on authenticity?
all these clocks are questionable,
could be a old clock with a reproduction face .. ...
Looks similar to my original. My letters are not outlined like yours. Mine is a Swihart clock. Yours looks like a Pam.
Agree with randy, I always question these when they show no age. Chris
Hmmm?? Thanks guys.
Yeah, I think Randy makes a good point.
Very nice clock Keith!
You need to get more pics. Telechron and many other clock makers had baked lens like a globe. Pam did not(although there are known examples of pams with a baked face),that's why they always flake off after years go buy. Look at the small lettering below the number six,and see what it says if any. Also need to see the back of the face,all white or can you see the colors and shelving thru it. Dirty Telechron faces can be washed,and look like brand new. But don't try that withnavPam.
Also need to see the back of the face,all white or can you see the colors and shelving thru it. .
Which is correct for an authentic piece?
A couple more pics he sent me.
Frankenclock. Not a Pam body ,but has Pam on the lens. Not an original clock imo
Thanks Mick!!!
Man these clocks are nothing but trouble!!