#41776
Mon Oct 31 2005 08:36 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 538
Petro Enthusiast
|
OP
Petro Enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 538 |
I am thinking about retracting my bid on this item, I believe it's a repro, would like some input from you sign experts. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7191953417&rd=1&sspagename=STRK%3AMEBI%3AIT&rd=1
thanks, Brandon
|
|
|
Please - NO offers to Buy or Sell in this forum category
Statements such as, "I'm thinking about selling this." are considered an offer to sell.
|
|
#41777
Mon Oct 31 2005 08:52 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 796
Petro Enthusiast
|
Petro Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 796 |
Brandon- I am with you in the repo boat, not enough bidding on this very nice sign. Its advertised in the right catagory but there is just not enough action for me to throw a couple of hundred bucks away. If this is real it should go for over a grand I think.
Scott
Scott Wanted- Powerine and Powerlube items!
|
|
|
#41778
Mon Oct 31 2005 10:19 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,785
Veteran Member
|
Veteran Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,785 |
I've always been a little afraid of these as some were popped. The original go from $700 to $1300 and I have had the chance to hold them. Originals have very heavy porcelain and the sign is heavy for being little. I would stay away from this one unless you got a whole bunch of info. Size,weight, etc.The seller doesn't have any other gas stuff so beware. No action on the sign shows me it's popped. Having a sign for 20 years does not tell you anything. Read the question about it. The seller says it's almost smooth. Repops aren't thick. My 2 cents. Ted ------------------ Ted Pam & Ethyl Roach Lodi CA. Home of Roach & Darnell Texaco 1952 -1963 & Richfield Arco 1963 - 1972 pca-west.org vintage-logos [This message has been edited by troach (edited 10-31-2005).]
Ted Pam Ethyl & Polly Roach Lodi CA. 209-210-8971 Looking for Signal, Hancock, Mohawk, Douglas, Gilmore and Richfield
|
|
|
#41779
Mon Oct 31 2005 10:41 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,918 Likes: 1
Veteran Member
|
Veteran Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,918 Likes: 1 |
BE AFRAID....BE VERY AFRAID....RUN BESGAR!
|
|
|
#41780
Mon Oct 31 2005 06:46 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,970
Veteran Member
|
Veteran Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,970 |
Yeah, I have a Red Crown scrip sign from that era & it has heavy shelving like Ted stated, & the metal is usually kind of "wavy" on these things. Also, it might be his camera, but the colors look a little "off" to me.
|
|
|
#41781
Mon Oct 31 2005 06:56 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 485
Petro Enthusiast
|
Petro Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 485 |
I'm with Ted. I'd be very leery of this sign without holding it in my hands. That being said, I'm not aware that these Standard of California Red Crown signs were ever repopped. Keep in mind, it's a double-sided paddle sign with limited collector appeal. If it is a repop, my guess it's very recent. I don't believe they did double-sided repops 20 years ago. Of course, you learn something new every day in this hobby.
Any more opinions??
Paul
|
|
|
#41782
Tue Nov 01 2005 07:08 PM
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 358
Petro Enthusiast
|
Petro Enthusiast
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 358 |
I am not a Red Crown collector, but I didn't think that anybody was repoping two sided porcellin signs. Could be I just hadn't paid attention to what was going on. Seems to me that if this sign is real someone could end up with a sweet deal.It would be interesting to have a local collector go check this one out before the auction ends.
Craig
Craig
|
|
|
#41783
Tue Nov 01 2005 07:38 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 485
Petro Enthusiast
|
Petro Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 485 |
Craig, Unfortunately, in recent years there have been several repop 30 inch porcelain signs turn up. At first, they fooled a lot of collectors. I mean, who would think a repop could be double-sided?? Some examples...Gulf 30" disc, Phillips Ethyl 30" shield and Texaco 30" round black 'T' star (fantasy).
The Red Crown paddle sign only went to $178 and didn't meet reserve. That's suspicious in itself. It may well be a repop but I haven't seen one before. As mentioned, the proof would be examining it up close. An original sign would have to be heavy porcelain with significant shelving.
Paul
|
|
|
|
|