Uploaded with ImageShack.us


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

First let me say I realize these arent the same images but its all I have and I am just posting these to compare the quality of signage Richfield used. The first image is the sign in question. I certainly see that the quality is far less than the known original. There is actually a little shelving to the paint of the original whereas the one in question seems very thinly painted or almost "Ink" stamped.The known original is double sided-the one in question is not. The original is dated ,the one in question is not. There are the two mounting holes in what apears to be the right spots on the questionable one...

Last edited by JimT; Sat May 07 2011 02:54 AM.